The Pipeline Does Not Grade Scars

On AI screening, cargo-cult craft, and what happens when hiring systems forget how to evaluate design.

Nobody is reading portfolios anymore.

Design is being replaced by the look of design. Products vibe-coded overnight. Case studies reverse-engineered from screenshots that were never fought for. You polish a portfolio for a recruiter who will never open it, while a model scores your résumé before a human learns your name.

I spent 15+ years watching the craft shift under my hands: print to pixels, pixels to systems, systems to prompts. I learned hierarchy the slow way. Semantics. Spacing that earns trust. The difference between a button that looks clickable and one that feels inevitable. I read Norman on doors that fight you, Krug on not making people think, Bringhurst and Lupton on type that carries meaning instead of costume. That education does not live in a keyword field.

We built machines to save us time, and handed them the one thing they cannot hold: judgment. I am not anti-AI. I use it. I ship with it. A pencil has never once cared what it wrote. The sickness is taste laundering: the surface of craft without owning a decision. What still cannot be generated is sitting with someone crying over their tax return, or choosing what not to build when the roadmap is hungry.

And none of that shows up as a confidence score. Not shipping TurboTax and ProFile at Intuit. Not scaling systems at Demand Science. Not co-founding SendNow, managing design at MarketPlate, or leading teams at Blank Space. Add the credentials, the 15+ years, and the history, and suddenly I am “overqualified” for the very roles that cannot see me. The pipeline does not grade scars. It grades keywords.

So this letter is the portfolio. The receipts stay linked if a human wants them. If you need a machine to tell you I have done the job, you were never going to hire me anyway.

Taste is judgment with scars on it. And judgment is earned the slow way.